<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: De-Mystifying Resolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/image-photo-resolution-information-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/image-photo-resolution-information-guide/</link>
	<description>Photography Tips &#38; Techniques</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/image-photo-resolution-information-guide/#comment-6770</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 05:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.picturecorrect.com/?p=3065#comment-6770</guid>
		<description>Mark - I also shoot RAW, but convert to TIFF. Why take chances with .jpg, in case you ever need to make additional adjustments to any of the sized/cropped images and re-save them? I use the same concept when scanning - scan at a huge resolution for archiving, then save as TIFF. Edit only on a copy of the original scan/photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; I also shoot RAW, but convert to TIFF. Why take chances with .jpg, in case you ever need to make additional adjustments to any of the sized/cropped images and re-save them? I use the same concept when scanning &#8211; scan at a huge resolution for archiving, then save as TIFF. Edit only on a copy of the original scan/photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/image-photo-resolution-information-guide/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.picturecorrect.com/?p=3065#comment-446</guid>
		<description>I always shoot in RAW and then convert to .jpg. If you&#039;re serious about photo quality then why not use the capabilities of your camera? I have never understood shooting a smaller size. Storage is not that expensive, so who cares if you can get 1000 images on one memory card?

I fix the RAW image if needed, convert at full size .jpg, then make copies to crop down to whatever size I desire, whether it be 4x6, 5x7, etc. Later on I can go back and make copies of the &quot;big&quot; file and recrop different ways or do whatever I want with them. It has come in handy more times than I can count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always shoot in RAW and then convert to .jpg. If you&#8217;re serious about photo quality then why not use the capabilities of your camera? I have never understood shooting a smaller size. Storage is not that expensive, so who cares if you can get 1000 images on one memory card?</p>
<p>I fix the RAW image if needed, convert at full size .jpg, then make copies to crop down to whatever size I desire, whether it be 4&#215;6, 5&#215;7, etc. Later on I can go back and make copies of the &#8220;big&#8221; file and recrop different ways or do whatever I want with them. It has come in handy more times than I can count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

