Debunking the Full-Frame Camera Superiority Myth

Are you the type of photographer who swears by his full-frame camera and can easily get into a fight with anybody denying its quality? Do you absolutely and utterly despise crop sensor cameras? You may be in for a rude shock. In this video, Zack Arias explains the futility of this snobbery:

A lot of full-frame users would say, “You know what, I just don’t want to give up the quality of a full-frame sensor.”

Well to clarify, dear full-frame user, there is absolutely no merit in you trying to bully the humble APS-C user. To drive the point home, Arias points out the differences between the different formats of film and sensors.

35mm vs aps-c

Point and Shoot Sensor (far left) vs. 35mm Film (highlighted) vs 4 x 5 Format Film (far right)

Back in the days of film photography there were the 35mm film cameras, then the medium format, and finally the large format, which included the 4 x 5, 8 x 10, 5 x 7 and even the 11 x 14. In those days, medium format was king. It was the most commonly used format because—believe it or not—35mm (or full-frame) was considered too small!

Even then, there were photographers who preferred not to shoot with a 645 because it was considered too small for comfort. It was sometimes referred to as the “35mm of medium format” (all of a sudden 35mm seems like a bad thing). They preferred to shoot in 6 x 7 instead.

medium format 6 x 7 film

Arias compares the size of a 6 x 7 film. Heck, it’s bigger than a GoPro!

If you’re already reeling, just don’t pass out yet. There’s more!

The 6 x 7 format, even with its large size, was not quite big enough for some photographers. They preferred shooting on the 4 x 5 format. And if that isn’t enough, some photographers wielded the heavy and intimidating 8 x 10 format cameras.

By now you are probably convinced that there is as much merit in fighting over the optical superiority of the full-frame sensor over APS-C as there is fighting over Nikon or Canon is the better camera make. As Arias reiterates probably half a dozen times in the video, the difference is negligible.

Now, if you move from APS-C to something like the 6 x 7, that’s something to talk about.

If you are still not convinced skip to 8:53 in the video and listen to how subtly Arias explains the futility of this full-frame 35mm vs. APS-C sensor comparison.

Like This Article?

Don't Miss The Next One!

Join over 100,000 photographers of all experience levels who receive our free photography tips and articles to stay current:

8 responses to “Debunking the Full-Frame Camera Superiority Myth”

  1. ernaldo says:

    I own both systems (Nikon) and like them both. I prefer my full frame bodies (D800/D700) for certain genres, like low light and night time shooting, my crop body (D7100) is a great walk around and wildlife camera…..There it is….

  2. dave says:

    Im with Andrea.. he was funny, and a bit of sarcasm. Maybe didnt learn a ton but the topic was put in a different perspective.

  3. michael mcandrews says:

    Zack makes everything about fuji cause he loves them. Im willing to bet everyone bitching about it wouldn’t care if he made it about nikon or canon.

  4. Wes Triplett says:

    I cannot believe I just wasted 10 minutes to hear something that could have been said in 90 seconds if this guy just had an editor! What did I learn? Nothing.

  5. Ed Fitzgerald says:

    Couldn’t get this to run on my MAC mini. Read Sam’s comment so I guess it’s no big loss. I’m sure it would have been worth listening to.

  6. You could have made it sound less like a commercial for Fuji:}

  7. Andrea says:

    This is not my fight, but the video was very entertaining. Hope to see the shots from the Property Brothers show since it is a favorite of mine.
    Can we have more, please?

  8. Sam Cox says:

    Well, that was an annoying advertisement for Fuji.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *