<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better Photography &#8211; Using Your Built-in Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/better-photography-using-your-built-in-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/better-photography-using-your-built-in-flash/</link>
	<description>Photography Tips &#38; Techniques</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:40:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thanh Thuy</title>
		<link>http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/better-photography-using-your-built-in-flash/#comment-8255</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanh Thuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.picturecorrect.com/?p=1303#comment-8255</guid>
		<description>This is just what I have been looking for! Very clear explanation! Many thanks! I am an amateur but photography is my hobby. Earlier I had no idea how to use the flash in a proper way! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just what I have been looking for! Very clear explanation! Many thanks! I am an amateur but photography is my hobby. Earlier I had no idea how to use the flash in a proper way! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.picturecorrect.com/tips/better-photography-using-your-built-in-flash/#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.picturecorrect.com/?p=1303#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>Finally, someone with a clear explanation of the &quot;problem&quot; with underexposure of flash images at  the published flash distances of small digital cameras!  Many thanks!

Most sites explain the inverse law, the extrapolation of distance and aperture, but do not mention about the &#039;large room/small room&#039; phenomenon.  With a small camera maximum range of just 3metres (manufacturer&#039;s small room specification),  in a large room, one can barely get 2m distance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, someone with a clear explanation of the &#8220;problem&#8221; with underexposure of flash images at  the published flash distances of small digital cameras!  Many thanks!</p>
<p>Most sites explain the inverse law, the extrapolation of distance and aperture, but do not mention about the &#8216;large room/small room&#8217; phenomenon.  With a small camera maximum range of just 3metres (manufacturer&#8217;s small room specification),  in a large room, one can barely get 2m distance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

