Interior Photography: How to Get Good
Results With an Everyday Digital Camera and No Lights
By: Sebastian Palmer
Good
pictures of interiors are a must if you want to make
a good impression, but it is notoriously difficult
to get good results with a consumer camera. In my
work photographing villas for holiday rentals I have
worked out some short cuts to getting good results
with minimal and cheap equipment and at great speed.
Here's how.
The problems you will encounter are practical and to
do with light. Consumer cameras are designed for use
outdoors in daylight. Interiors are very dark in
comparison. Most cameras respond by popping up the
flash, but the results of that are dingy: things
that are close to the camera are too bright, and
things that are further away are too dark. A similar
problem is contrast range (that is the difference
between very bright and very dark): your camera does
not do as well as your eyes, resulting in windows
that are 'burnt out', too bright and lacking detail.
Consumer cameras set to automatic exposure will try
to find a middle ground between the dark and the
bright which results in pictures which are too dark
in darker parts and too light in lighter parts.
The use of light is fundamental to architecture and
building design in general. You need to use the
light that is already in the room if you want to
show it off to the best advantage. Professional
photographers use artificial lighting, but the skill
is balancing that with making the most of the
available light. Flash units are used to fill dark
corners and lift the general light level to an
acceptable level, so that the windows no longer burn
out and the camera can cope with the contrast in the
image, but the natural light in the room is what
sells the picture.
I
don't have time for all that. I usually have an hour
to photograph a house, and so have had to develop a
technique that solves many of the problems of
interiors. I don't claim that the results are as
good as those of a professional with professional
equipment, but they are just about acceptable which
is better than most of the pictures our competitors
publish. But there is no time to set lights. The
solution is to take a series of pictures that are
each well exposed for a part of the overall image,
and then stick them all together electronically.
The way to take good pictures without lights is to
take several shots with identical framing and
different exposure times. To do that you use a
tripod. It does not have to be expensive: tripods
that you can buy for about £30 ($60) will be just
fine, but the table top type will not do. Be sure
that its highest position is at about your eye
height or above. It doesn't matter if it moves a
tiny bit because you will be using a wide lens, so
the usual advantages of an expensive tripod are
lost.
Pick a shot and fix the camera in that position with
the tripod. You need a range of shots from very
light to very dark with no camera movement
whatsoever between shots. The way to find the
starting exposure is to experiment. Fix the aperture
on f8 or smaller (which helps to guarantee that
everything from near to far will be in focus if you
are using a wide lens) and start at an exposure of
about one second. Take a picture and look at the
back of the camera. The approach is deliberately
slapdash: forget the burnt out windows and
concentrate on the furniture. If it looks too bright
then you are in the right parish. If not, make it
two seconds. Now shorten the exposure: half a
second, quarter, eighth, and so on until the shots
you are taking are obviously much too dark. But
never ever move the camera even a little bit: you'll
see why later. If you jog the camera, start again.
Finally
take a shot in which the windows look about right –
that is to say in which you can see the leaves and
the rest of the room is probably black or something
like it. Take as many shots as you like: digital
storage is cheap! When you have finished you have a
number of shots (in my case, usually about 10)
ranging from the very light to the very dark but
with identical framing.
When you get back to base, all you have to do is
stick it all together. Use whatever image processing
software you have: you will not need advanced
features. In my case it is Paint Shop Pro. I think
it fell off the front of a magazine once.
Alternatively you can use Gimp which is free and
works on Windows and Linux, but takes a bit of
getting used to. What follows can be fiddly and time
consuming at first, but practise a little and you
will find it easier and easier. It should take no
more than 10 minutes when you have done it a few
times.
Choose two pictures. Take a shot that gives a decent
exposure of the furnishings, then take a picture
that gives a decent exposure of the outside (the
windows). The goal is to cut out the windows in the
'interior' shot such that the windows of the
'window' shot fit nicely into them. The way you do
that varies with the shot, but the simplest way is
to put the window layer behind the interior layer
and use the eraser tool or similar to rub out the
windows: as you do that the properly exposed windows
show through like magic. Job almost done. Often that
is all I do. Use the eraser at less than 100%
opacity to blur the edges.
Sometimes
some extra cleaning up is necessary: table lamps for
example are also often too bright, but the principle
is the same: find a less bright lamp in one of the
other shots, and erase it into place. At this stage
you are using the eraser set to less than 100%
opacity to blur the edges a bit. Professional
Photoshop artists don't like this, and prefer to use
masks and alpha channels and so forth. Let them. The
goal here is to keep it simple!
This technique is very simple in terms of equipment
and processing, but does need some practice. Start
practicing now and your next set of pictures will
look great. Only you will know that you used a cheap
camera, some cheap (probably free) software and no
lights.
Seb Palmer works at
Palmer and Parker Villa Holidays, offering
Rental villas in France, Spain and the Algarve. See
results of this method at
http://www.palmerparker.com/sv/housenum292.htm
For contrast, look at proper professional pictures
of a
villa in the Algarve.
|